Resources · Free
Free resourceHire, or automate?
Before you post the job listing, run the role through this. Five questions, ten minutes, and you'll know whether the bottleneck needs a person or an AI employee — before you spend six figures finding out the hard way.
Why this matters
Every time work piles up, the reflex is "we need to hire." Sometimes that's right. Often it isn't — the work isn't too much for one person, it's just stuck in a process that was never built to move fast. Hiring into a broken process doesn't fix the process. It just adds a salary to it.
Pick one real bottleneck before you start. A specific role or task you're actually considering hiring for — not a hypothetical. The diagnostic works best against something real.
Run it through these five questions
1. Is the bottleneck volume, or judgment?
"There's too much of this to get through." A volume problem.
"We need someone to make the right call each time." A judgment problem.
2. Does the work follow a pattern, or is every case genuinely different?
You could write a flowchart for how 80% of cases get handled.
Every case needs fresh judgment, with no real repeat pattern.
3. Does it require a relationship, or just an output?
It's purely about producing a correct output.
It depends on trust built over time with a specific person.
4. Is the real problem the work, or the process around the work?
The process itself is the bottleneck — more hands won't fix it.
The process is fine; it genuinely needs more capacity.
5. What happens if it's inconsistent?
Small variation is fine, or low-stakes to catch and fix.
A wrong answer costs real money, trust, or compliance standing.
Reading your answers
Mostly volume, pattern, and output? You likely have an automate candidate — an AI employee could take this on, trained on how your business actually does it. Mostly judgment, relationship, and high-stakes variation? That's a real hire. AI can still support it, but shouldn't own it.
Most roles are actually a mix: a repeatable 80% that drags on a person's time, and a judgment-heavy 20% that's the real reason you'd hire. The move isn't always "hire" or "automate" — it's often separating the two, automating the 80%, and keeping a person focused on the 20% that actually needs them.
Most businesses can't tell
which one they're looking at.
Because they're looking at the role, not the workflow underneath it. That's the first thing we map in a Strategy Session.
See if we're a fit →